Alliance to End Plastic Waste’s “greenwashing” exposed
The nonprofit Alliance to End Plastic Waste has been called a “Bond-style villain” of greenwashing and political manipulation in a new report. Members include oil giants ExxonMobil, Shell and TotalEnergies, who produce millions more tons of plastic than they collect.
Bali recycling scheme: broken equipment & poor finances
An Alliance to End Plastic Wasteproject in Bali was found abandonedafter its initial launch, with broken equipment and inadequate financing. It is still promoted on their website as a project designed to be “economically self-sufficient” and making a “positive contribution” to waste management on the island.
US no longer supports capping plastic production in UN treaty
Five key takeaways from the dramatic climate talks in Baku
This year’s climate talks, COP29, took place in Baku, Azerbaijan. The discussions focused on finance. Although a deal was struck, the support that developing countries will receive to face devastating climate impacts is a “paltry” sum. This article highlights five key takeaways from the meeting.
Need for systemic change, says Malaysian Trash Hero
“Clean-ups are effective in the short run but don’t address the systemic issues,” says Zurainee Kula, chapter leader of Trash Hero Kota Kinabalu, in this interview with the Daily Express about the best ways to take action on waste.
What do you think about these stories? Is there one we missed? Let us know in the comments!
Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.
A new study has shown bees are eating nano- and microplastics and using them to build nests. The plastic damages their digestive and immune systems. It also causes behavioural changes that prevent pollination and lead to ecosystem damage.
Official: waste is the dirtiest form of power after coal
A BBC investigation has found burning household rubbish to make energy is the dirtiest way to produce power, just after coal. Incineration releases significant greenhouse gases, especially when burning plastic. Experts warn this “waste-to-energy” undermines climate goals and contributes to air pollution..
Scientists warn of microplastics exposure via makeup
Microplastic exposure from leave-on cosmetics like eye shadow and lipstick has been flagged as an area of serious concern. Scientists are calling for more research into the health impacts of prolonged skin contact with these common products and their petrochemical-based ingredients.
70% of plastic in a UK recycling scheme found burned abroad
In the UK it’s common to drop off soft plastics at supermarkets for recycling. But a recent investigation that tracked their journey revealed that 70% ended up being burned abroad, mostly in Türkiye. A damning report from the Environmental Investigation Agency reveals this was not an isolated incident.
More than half of plastic food packaging can be replaced
A recent study has shown that the majority of plastic food packaging across Europe can be replaced or eliminated altogether. The finding supports the calls for reusable packaging infrastructure that would reduce waste and the unhealthy reliance on plastic.
What do you think about these stories? Is there one we missed? Let us know in the comments!
Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.
California sues ExxonMobil over false claims about recycling
ExxonMobil is being taken to court for misleading the public about the effectiveness of recycling. The state of California says the oil giant’s false claims have lead directly to an increase in plastic pollution. Environmental groups praised the lawsuit, saying it would hold the industry accountable.
Our bodies contain over 3,600 chemicals from food packaging
A Swiss study has found more than 3,600 chemicals used in food packaging inside the human body, including BPA and PFAS. These chemicals can migrate from packaging into food and may have long-term health impacts. The study highlights the need for more research into their migration and health effects.
Is plastic the biggest climate threat?
At New York Climate Week, researchers called for the world to focus on the role of plastics in global warming. This editorial argues that leaving plastic production out of any agreed fossil fuel phase down is a huge and dangerous loophole – but one that could be addressed in the new Global Plastics Treaty.
Fans protest K-Pop’s wasteful album production
K-pop activist group K4P protested outside Hybe’s headquarters, calling for the company to stop campaigns encouraging fans to buy multiple physical copies of albums and other plastic merchandise. A survey found 42.8% of K-Pop fans considered Hybe’s marketing tactics as the “worst business practice”.
Volunteer-led initiative is helping temples go zero waste
Volunteers in Bengaluru are helping their local temples to go zero waste. The initiative promotes waste segregation, composting, and reducing single-use plastic in the offerings and involves both temple staff and visitors.
What do you think about these stories? Is there one we missed? Let us know in the comments!
Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.
US surprises many by backing limits on plastic production
In a closed-door briefing, the White House signalled support for capping plastic production. No official announcement has been made, but industry groups have made clear they oppose the change. The shift sparks optimism for a more proactive approach to plastic pollution.
Microplastics make up 0.5% of human brain tissue
New studies reveal microplastics have infiltrated human brains, raising serious health concerns. Researchers urge global action to address plastic pollution as evidence mounts of its harmful effects on various organs. While the full extent of health risks is unclear, studies link microplastics to inflammation, cardiovascular issues, and fertility problems.
Plastic packaging linked to increased autism in boys
A recent study found a link between exposure to BPA, a chemical commonly used in plastic packaging, and increased autism risk in young boys. The study examined BPA levels in pregnant mothers and tracked their children’s development. The researchers found that higher BPA exposure was associated with a suppressed enzyme crucial for brain development. Leading to a greater likelihood of autism diagnosis.
Is your water bottle really made from recycled plastic?
This article highlights the lack of transparency in “mass balance” accounting for recycled plastic. While companies can claim products contain recycled plastic, the system doesn’t guarantee a specific amount, making it difficult for consumers to know the true content of products they purchase.
What do you think about these stories? Is there one we missed? Let us know in the comments!
Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.
Over 100 athletes ask Coca-Cola and PepsiCo to champion reuse
Over 100 elite athletes have signed an open letter to Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, urging them to use the Paris 2024 Olympics as a launchpad to increase reusable packaging and reduce single-use plastic. They highlighted the impact of plastic pollution on the environment and athletes’ health.
Shell backs away from pledge to increase “advanced recycling”
Shell has quietly abandoned their pledge to increase “advanced recycling” of plastic due to market challenges and regulatory uncertainty. Critics argue this technology is ineffective and polluting. Shell continues expanding plastic production.
Apparel industry leaks tonnes of plastic waste into environment
The global apparel industry is a major source of plastic pollution, with over 20 million tons of plastic waste generated in 2019. Synthetic clothing is the biggest culprit, but plastic packaging and waste management issues also contribute to the problem. This overlooked source of pollution is getting worse, highlighting the need for industry changes.
Retailers expand the culture of reuse in Germany
Germany, known for recycling, is trying to revive reusable packaging. Small shops offer products in refillable containers, but logistical challenges remain. Store owners believe it needs to be more convenient for people to reduce waste.
“We cannot achieve our climate goals without plastic reduction”
Plastic pollution is a growing crisis fueled by companies prioritising profits over environmental responsibility. This interview with Trash Hero Co-founder Roman Peter reveals the devastating impact of plastic waste, from littering to health risks, while exposing the recycling industry’s deceptive practices. He asks for a systemic shift towards reusable packaging and reduced plastic production. This Swiss article can be translated into English.
What do you think about these stories? Is there one we missed? Let us know in the comments!
Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.
Sign up below to receive the alerts directly to your inbox. There’s no cost and no spam ever.
“Every week you consume a credit card’s worth of plastic.” You may have seen this claim on social media, but is it an urban myth or reality? We’re looking at why it might well be true.
How does plastic get into our food?
Modern-day food packaging is made almost exclusively from plastic – cling wrap, styrofoam boxes, and sachets are just a few examples. As plastic is used the surface breaks up into tiny particles. These are classified by their size. Microplastics are tiny fragments less than 5mm in length (roughly the size of a piece of rice). Even smaller, and invisible to the naked eye, are nanoplastics. These measure 100 nanometers (0.0001mm) or less. To visualise the difference, if a large piece of microplastic were the size of a football, a “large” nanoplastic would be the size of a sesame seed. For the purposes of this article, we’ll call all these fragments “microplastics”.
Certain environments speed up the deterioration of plastic, meaning it releases even more particles. These include heat, such as from a microwave, and fat, grease and acidity from food. Direct contact with food is part of the reason microplastics end up on our plates, but they’re also found in products that haven’t been wrapped in plastic. So how do they get there?
Environment: Microplastics contaminate soil and water. Plants absorb these, or they are ingested by livestock, passing into our fruit, vegetables and dairy products.
Airborne microplastics: Plastic production, use, recycling and incineration release microplastics into the atmosphere, which are then inhaled by animals in the food chain.
Agriculture: Water containing microplastics is used for irrigation. Plastic mulch used to suppress weeds is ploughed into the soil where plants and vegetables grow. Even fertilisers are encapsulated in plastic.
Processing: High temperatures during food processing can increase leaching from plastic equipment. Contact with vinyl gloves worn by food handlers, plastic tubing in processing machines, and the conveyor belt can contribute to the plastic in our meals.
So one way or another, most of our food and drink contains some level of microplastic. Eating plastic raises serious concerns. But why is this?
Chemicals in plastic
Up to 50% of plastic, by weight, is chemical additives. These are used to change how plastic behaves – for example making it flexible, hard, heat resistant, or stretchy – or to give it different colours or shine. A staggering 16,325 different chemicals have to date been identified, but the actual number is likely close to 100,000! You’ve probably heard of some already:
Bisphenol A (BPA) hardens plastic
Phthalates make plastic soft and flexible
Flame retardants make plastic more resistant to heat
An even larger chunk, 66%, are a mystery – scientists don’t know enough about them to say what their effects could be. Under current regulations, companies are not required to share full information about the ingredients in their plastic packaging. And many of the chemicals present are not even intentionally added – they are by-products of reactions between other additives.
This is one of the issues with recycled plastic. Melting down and mixing different types of plastic to make a new material creates a complex “cocktail” of unknown chemicals, further complicating our understanding of the health risks.
A large body of independent research shows our constant exposure to the known chemicals in plastic, even at low levels, could pose a serious risk over time. However, the cumulative nature of microplastic exposure makes it difficult to identify the exact chemicals causing health issues. This lack of clarity is an issue for regulators.
What regulations are there to protect us?
Some regulations are in place to limit harmful chemicals, but these vary depending on location and the specific types of plastic. The current approach relies on risk-based assessment. This means chemicals can be used freely with limited safety information and need to be proven hazardous before they are banned. This can take up to 20 years! It also allows for “regrettable substitution”, where companies can replace a banned chemical with a structurally similar one with a different name. A prime example is Bisphenol A (BPA). It was commonly found in reusable plastic water bottles until it became restricted due to safety concerns. It’s been replaced with other bisphenols, like BPS or BPF which are likely just as harmful.
Chemicals used in consumer goods and packaging should instead follow the precautionary principle. This says chemicals need to be proven safe before they can be used. With this approach, when there is not enough data to establish safety, we assume there may be risks.
Negotiations for a global plastics treaty are well underway. Microplastics and chemical migration are high on the agenda. Scientists and activists are pushing for greater transparency in chemical use and a global shift towards the precautionary principle. The plastics industry is resisting, claiming the need for “trade secrets”, and saying a risk-based approach is enough.
Join us in calling for a strong plastics treaty, that protects us against harmful chemicals, by signing this petition. To learn more about what a strong treaty looks like head to the dedicated section of our website.
The microplastics map: which countries consume the most?
People consume microplastics through food and air. Recent studies have shown that the amount varies depending on your location. This microplastics map reveals which countries are consuming the most.
US state sues Coca-Cola and PepsiCo for plastic pollution
Baltimore takes legal action against plastic manufacturers, arguing they are responsible for plastic pollution harming the city’s environment and public health. Baltimore joins a growing movement holding plastic companies accountable for pollution and its health consequences.
EU warns “delaying tactics” will block the globals plastics treaty
The EU has warned that other countries’ delays are endangering the global plastics treaty. The key sticking point is whether to set targets to reduce plastic production. A small group of countries want to limit the agreement to addressing plastic pollution, while others want to include reducing plastic production and consumption.
Exposing the myth of chemical recycling
Unveiling the smoke and mirrors of pyrolysis, this article exposes how the plastic recycling industry inflates recycled content figures. While touted as a magic bullet, pyrolysis reduces new plastic production by a tiny per cent. The journalist dives into the calculations creating a misleading perception of its effectiveness.
How a small Pacific island cut plastic pollution
Vanuatu used to have a big plastic pollution problem, but after community pressure for action, the government banned single-use plastics. While there is still work to be done, it has made a big difference.
What do you think about these stories? Is there one we missed? Let us know in the comments!
What keeps Trash Hero volunteers organising regular cleanups year round? Perhaps the secret lies in our regular Trash Hero Family Meetings. Here, our chapter teams can network, share and better understand the “why” behind our actions. It’s an intense and often deep experience. As one volunteer from Thailand put it: “there is no other seminar as worthwhile to the soul and to the world“.
These meetings bring volunteers together for 3 days of:
knowledge building: workshops and presentations on the issues surrounding plastic pollution
skill strengthening: building capacity for community leadership
boosting motivation: creating positive energy and inspiration through sharing and connecting with others
This year’s Family Meetings, held in Indonesia and Thailand, centred around a fundamental question: why do we do cleanups?
The answer – which is not necessarily what people expect – shaped the rest of the content: to provide education about zero waste and build community engagement.
Workshops encouraged volunteers to think critically about waste. We explored the big picture, understanding that litter is just a symptom of a larger systemic problem.
Informative presentations shared new knowledge about the impact plastic has on the climate and our health.
Group sessions looked at building trust in communities, leadership skills and effective communication.
Games and quizzes helped keep everyone energised while also reinforcing the learning material.
A group cleanup showed the possibility for education, best practices and (in Indonesia) a brand audit.
The Indonesian gathering saw almost 60 participants travel from all corners of the country to Sanur, Bali from 31 May – 2 June.
In Thailand, the event took place from 7 – 9 June in Bangkok. It brought together participants from across Southeast Asia, including Thailand, Malaysia, Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar. Sessions took place in parallel in Thai and English, with volunteers happily mingling during the breaks and cleanup activity. As one volunteer from Malaysia said “language was no barrier at all when you feel and see the same things”
The sessions with guest speakers, leadership coaches Pak Made Pay (Indonesia) and Khun Amnat (Thailand), proved very popular, with their insights into team building and the qualities needed for effective leadership. Thank you to both for sharing their wisdom, which will no doubt have an impact on our chapter teams. We hope to provide similar training to all volunteers soon.
Following the meetings, we sent out a feedback survey to all participants and the response was overwhelmingly positive. 100% of volunteers who replied felt more knowledgeable about both zero waste and plastic pollution, and 96% felt their motivation increased. One volunteer from Thailand commented: “the event made me know more about plastic waste, from the source to the solutions, with activities that connect people from different regions.”
Trash Hero World fully supports the family meetings, covering the travel, food, accommodation costs for all participants. We also handle the logistics and content design, creation and delivery.
In July, volunteers from Trash Hero in Switzerland and Germany will hold a zero waste picnic to celebrate their hard work and support new chapter leaders. The shared experiences, the learning and the connections – these are the things that keep us all motivated in our mission to create a world free from plastic pollution.
Let’s keep the momentum going.
Trash Hero Indonesia Family Meeting 31 May – 2 June
Microplastics found in every human testicle tested
A new study found microplastics in all human and dog testes tested. This may be linked to declining sperm counts in men.The research is in its early stages, but it adds to evidence of widespread microplastic contamination and potential health risks.
More plastic production = more plastic pollution
A new study reveals a strong link between plastic production and plastic pollution. Every 1% increase in production leads to a 1% rise in pollution. The Coca-Cola Company is the top polluter, responsible for 11% of branded plastic waste. The study calls for reduced plastic production and stronger regulations on corporations.
Small cheap sachets are causing big problems
Single-use plastic sachets are a major environmental problem in Southeast Asia. They are cheap and popular, but difficult to recycle and often end up in landfills or waterways. A first of it’s kind study, co-produced by Trash Hero Indonesia and members of Break Free From Plastic, dives into who is responsible for this waste.
High levels of toxic plastic chemicals in Shein products
Shein products, including children’s shoes, had toxic chemicals hundreds of times above safety limits. South Korea is requesting removal of these items and inspections show nearly half of tested Shein products contain harmful substances.
Lawyer to plastics makers: prepare for big lawsuits
A lawyer predicts a wave of lawsuits against PFAS, a toxic chemical used in plastic, manufacturers due to potential health risks. PFAS are “forever chemicals” are linked to cancer and other health problems. The legal battle is expected to be massive, potentially exceeding asbestos litigation.
What do you think about these stories? Is there one we missed? Let us know in the comments!
Break Free From Plastic (BFFP) released a first-of-its-kind report, and Trash Hero Indonesia co-produced it.
For the past six years, members of the BFFP movement have worked together, collecting information about who is responsible for the plastic pollution we find on our beaches, rivers, and towns. The annual brand audit report compiles global data and shines a light on the brands responsible for plastic pollution. This information can then be used to advocate for systemic change. In fact, when New York Attorney General James filed a lawsuit against PepsiCo for “polluting the environment and endangering public health through its single-use plastic bottles, caps and wrappers”, data from the brand audits was cited in the press release.
Previous brand audit reports have collected data on all types of plastic. However, sachet pollution has increased at alarming rates across Asia, leading many environmental groups to demand that companies phase out sachets. To better understand the scale and source of sachet pollution and to be able to push for real change, a group of BFFP NGOs from Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, and the Philippines came together to take action.
A sachet is an environmental nightmare. Most of them have an airtight inner plastic layer that protects the product, a foil barrier against moisture and heat, and an outer flexible layer that can be printed on. An adhesive holds it all together. The multiple layers make it impossible to recycle effectively. Their light weight means they often end up in forests, rivers, and oceans. From here, animals mistake them for food and get sick or even die after consuming them. Discarded sachets also worsen flooding by clogging waterways and drains, leading to more water-borne diseases. For something that is used for seconds, they have a very long-lasting impact! This devastating impact has been widely recognised, with even former CEO of Unilever, Paul Polman, stating, “We need to get rid of sachets for good”. Yet their use worldwide continues. Our article “Exposing the hidden cost of sachets” dives into the environmental and social issues of sachets in more detail.
Collecting the data
Between October 2023 and February 2024, 807 volunteers organised brand audits in 50 locations across India, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam. Together, these volunteers from 25 organisations collected a total of 33,467 sachets
Alongside colleagues from YPBB, Ecoton and Greenpeace, Trash Hero Indonesia adjusted the brand audit methodology to suit sachets. They then collected and collated the data from the sachet brand audits in Indonesia and helped develop and draft the report.
Trash Hero Indonesia trained volunteers in the new process and rallied Trash Hero volunteers across Indonesia to participate. Data from Indonesia made up 29% of the total data published in the report. 476 volunteers took part, counting 9,698 sachets across 34 locations. 1,212 brands were identified. The Trash Hero Indonesia team collected and verified the data from all participating organisations in Indonesia. We want to say a big thank you to the 456 Trash Hero volunteers from 23 chapters who conducted sachet brand audits!
What did the report find?
The report identified the top ten brands responsible for sachet pollution across Indonesia, India, Vietnam and the Philippines:
Unilever
Wings
Mayora Indah
Wadia Group
Balaji Wafers Private Limited
Procter & Gamble
Nestlé
Yes 2 Healthy Life
JG Summit Holdings
Salim Group
The audit identified 2,678 brands in four countries—India, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam—highlighting the extensive use of this problematic single-use packaging format.
The report also revealed a concerning trend in sachet material composition. Over half (57%) of the collected samples were multilayer sachets, while only 41% were single-layer. This is important because multilayer construction, combining different materials, makes recycling these sachets virtually impossible.
Members of the BFFP movement attended the fourth round of official negotiations for the Global Plastics Treaty and were able to present the report to country delegates.
What should corporations do?
Urgent action needs to be taken now to stop producing sachets. We, along with other members of the Break Free From Plastic movement, call on corporations to:
Take immediate action to phase out or quit sachets, to effectively address the environmental, social and economic impacts of these single-use plastics.
Reveal their plastic use by providing public data on the type and quantity of packaging used in different markets, and the chemicals in that packaging.
End support for false solutions such as burning plastic and chemical recycling. Sending sachets and other plastic packaging to cement kilns isn’t recycling.
Redesign business models away from single-use sachets and other single-use packaging of any type – including novel materials such as bio-based or compostable plastics.
Invest in accessible, affordable reuse, refill or packaging-free product delivery systems in all markets, while ensuring a just transition for all relevant workers.
LydiaTrash Hero Indonesia collaborates on first-ever sachet brand audit report
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.