Only 65 states out of 195 have submitted new plans to cut carbon, the UN says, despite all being required to do so. The task ahead in Belém, to get warming back under 1.5C, looks daunting.
What do you think about these stories? Is there one we missed? Let us know in the comments!
Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.
During the Holocene epoch, spanning the last 10,000 years, conditions on Earth have been remarkably stable. That stability allowed human societies to flourish: grow food, trade and build cities. But as unchecked capitalism pushes the planet beyond its safe limits, we risk tipping it into instability, with consequences for every living being.
Last month, scientists confirmed that humanity has now crossed seven of the nine planetary boundaries – thresholds beyond which the Earth’s environment can no longer self-regulate and may become unliveable.
But what exactly are these boundaries, and why does crossing them matter?
The concept of planetary boundaries was first introduced in 2009 by a group of internationally renowned environmental and Earth system scientists. The framework identifies nine critical processes that together form the planet’s life support system, regulating its stability and resilience. Each process has a “safe operating space”, the conditions that ensure the system works smoothly.
Leaving this space doesn’t mean immediate catastrophe, but it increases the risk of abrupt, non-linear and potentially irreversible environmental change. In other words, the further we push past these limits, the more likely we are to trigger tipping points that could undermine the very systems on which we depend for survival.
The nine planetary boundaries and where they stand in 2025
1. Climate change ➡︎ boundary exceeded
Our climate system regulates temperature, rainfall patterns, sea levels and the functioning of ecosystems. Human-driven greenhouse gas emissions, especially carbon dioxide and methane, and airborne pollutants are trapping heat in the atmosphere that would otherwise have escaped into space, pushing global temperatures well beyond the stable Holocene range. How this manifests: extreme weather events, flooding, wildfires, rising sea levels, desertification. The rate of ocean warming has doubled over the past 20 years.
2. Novel entities (chemicals and plastics) ➡︎ boundary exceeded
This category includes petrochemicals, all types of plastics, genetically modified organisms and other synthetic substances that are not biocompatible and often very harmful to living things. Many persist in the environment, forming toxic cocktails and contaminating entire ecosystems. How this manifests: widespread pollution from micro- and nanoplastics and PFAS (“forever chemicals”) in the water, air and soil.
3. Stratospheric ozone depletion ➡︎ currently within the safe zone.
The ozone layer shields life on Earth from harmful ultraviolet radiation from the sun. International action to reduce the production of ozone-depleting chemicals since the late 1980s and through the Montreal Protocol has successfully helped the layer to recover to within a safe operating space.
4. Atmospheric aerosols (air pollution) ➡︎ globally within the safe zone; exceeded in some regions.
Aerosols are tiny airborne particles such as dust, soot, sulphates and smoke. They affect air quality, human health, and regional climate patterns. This boundary is currently exceeded in many densely populated areas, especially those with heavy industrial and fuel incineration emissions, but globally is considered within safe limits. How this manifests: increased respiratory and other disease, exacerbation of climate change, changes to monsoon systems. One out of five early deaths is due to fossil fuel air pollution.
5. Ocean acidification ➡︎ boundary exceeded
The oceans absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. This makes seawater more acidic, which prevents corals, shellfish and some plankton from building and maintaining shells and skeletons, with devastating knock-on effects for those further up the food chain – including coastal communities. In the 2025 Planetary Health Check, the ocean was found to have increased in acidity by 30-40% since the start of the industrial era, making it the seventh boundary now judged to be in the danger zone. How this manifests: coral bleaching and death of tropical reefs, Arctic marine life under threat, food insecurity.
6. Biogeochemical flows ➡︎ boundary exceeded
This process describes how essential elements and compounds cycle through the Earth’s systems. Nitrogen and phosphorus are key nutrients for crops, but their overuse in industrial fertilisers has led to pollution, soil degradation and so-called dead zones in oceans and lakes. How this manifests: algal blooms caused by fertiliser run-off deplete oxygen and kill aquatic life, increased ocean acidification, infertile soil. There are currently more than 500 identified ocean dead zones, covering 95,000 square miles.
7. Freshwater change ➡︎ boundary exceeded
Freshwater availability and flow – both above, in and below the ground – are essential for agriculture, human consumption, and ecological stability. Pollution, dams, land conversion, over-abstraction and climate change have led to freshwater ecosystems being degraded in half the world’s countries. How this manifests: droughts, floods, degradation of water quality, loss of wetlands and mangroves. 25% of freshwater species are facing extinction.
8. Land-system change ➡︎ boundary exceeded
Around three quarters of natural landscapes on our planet have been “modified” for human use over the past millennium. This involves permanent changes such as urbanisation and potentially reversible changes such as the clearance of tropical rainforests for agriculture such as soy and palm oil. How this manifests: soil erosion and degradation, habitat destruction, desertification, forced migration, increased global warming. Global forest cover is now far below the 75% safety zone.
9. Biosphere integrity (loss of nature and biodiversity) ➡︎ boundary exceeded
The biosphere is the living layer of Earth and requires a large, broad and diverse range of healthy organisms to underpin food production, pollination, disease regulation and countless ecosystem services. Biodiversity loss means the system is less able to self-regulate and recover from shocks. How this manifests: poor crop yields (and food insecurity), accelerating species extinctions, ecosystem collapse.
A wake-up call, not the end
These processes are all interconnected. Pressure on one will inevitably lead to pressure on the others.
Crossing the seventh planetary boundary means that humanity is accelerating the deterioration of Earth systems, and moving further away from the stable conditions that made civilisation possible.
Unsurprisingly, having more than 3/4 of the lights on the dashboard flashing red increases whole system risks: we can expect to see more frequent extreme weather events, reduced resilience of ecosystems, greater water and food insecurity, and the possibility of triggering tipping points such as ice sheet collapse or rainforest dieback.
Yet the planetary boundaries framework is not a prediction of inevitable disaster; it is a risk management tool. We can use it to build momentum to bring systems back into the safe zone. The two intact boundaries are testament to this. Stratospheric ozone depletion – once close to its limit – has been brought back within a safe operating space, thanks to decades of international cooperation through the Montreal Protocol. Collective action on the other processes, which requires deep and rapid cuts in fossil fuel use (for both energy and plastics), can bring back Earth systems within safe limits – but the clock is ticking.
As Johan Rockström, Professor in Earth System Science, who led the development of the planetary boundaries framework says: “even if the diagnosis is dire, the window of cure is still open. Failure is not inevitable; failure is a choice. A choice that must and can be avoided.”
Extreme weather, combined with unchecked development and tonnes of plastic blocking drainage routes, led to the disaster that claimed at least 18 lives.
Industry body says cheap virgin and recycled plastics, imports, bureaucracy and rising energy costs have caused plant closures equivalent to one million tonnes of capacity since 2023.
The sharks’ eating habits mean they unwittingly carry and excrete toxic microplastics thousands of miles away from where they were ingested, complicating the task of tracking marine pollution.
New research finds tiny particles – smaller than those previously studied – linger in the air and bury themselves deep in our lungs, with air indoors and in cars being the most dangerous to breathe.
What do you think about these stories? Is there one we missed? Let us know in the comments!
Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals found in everyday plastics are a leading cause of male infertility and “subtle deformities” in development, according to environmental health experts.
Tuaran District Office in Sabah, Malaysia, invited stakeholders to help develop policies to reduce plastic use, alongside zero waste experts from the Philippines.
What do you think about these stories? Is there one we missed? Let us know in the comments!
Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.
California alone shipped 7,260 metric tonnes of plastic trash to the SE Asian country in 2024 – campaigners hope the state will now find a way to deal with it at home, rather than dumping it in a different country.
Korean authorities seized dozens of plastic umbrellas, coats and boots sold on AliExpress and Temu, which also contained dangerous levels of lead and formaldehyde.
What do you think about these stories? Is there one we missed? Let us know in the comments!
Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.
Microplastics are escalating into a financial and legal nightmare for businesses, forcing insurers to deal with potential health claims, environmental damages, and greenwashing lawsuits.
Swiss newspaper “20 Minutes” shares Trash Hero’s perspective on littering and why it is just one piece of the much larger crisis of waste and pollution.
What do you think about these stories? Is there one we missed? Let us know in the comments!
Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.
Study finds starch-based plastics cause organ damage and endocrine disruption in the same way as petroleum-based plastics, despire being marketed as natural, safe and ecofriendly.
A deep-dive into the history of “forever chemicals”, explaining how industry lobbying and cover-ups mean they are now in every corner of our lives.
What do you think about these stories? Is there one we missed? Let us know in the comments!
Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.
A new investigation joins the dots between controversial Texas shale gas, the petrochemicals industry and plastics made for companies such as Coca-Cola, Unilever and Nestle.
Particles in follicular fluid (which enables egg development) point to a strong link between plastic and infertility and other reproductive health issues.
Study says drop over the last decade may be due to greater public awareness, but more work must be done upstream.
What do you think about these stories? Is there one we missed? Let us know in the comments!
Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.
What image comes to mind when you picture a successful, busy character in a TV show? For many, it’s someone striding into an office, mobile phone in one hand and a disposable coffee cup in the other. This image of success and power has been reinforced by decades of TV and film. Think of Miranda Priestly in The Devil Wears Prada: a high-powered woman whose assistant fetches her very specific coffee order every day in a single-use cup. This is just one example of how props function as symbols of character and status. A throwaway lifestyle signifies success, but is this the right message to be sending audiences? And in general, given what we now know about its impact, should single-use plastic be presented on screen as a positive – or even neutral – part of society?
Media’s role in normalising behaviour
“We are shaped and formed by what we watch”- Diana Cohen, Co-founder and CEO of the Plastic Pollution Coalition (PPC).
The media has the power to normalise or demonise behaviours. Characters become popular because people relate to them, idolise them and want to be like them. Take smoking: once a symbol of the “cool” character (e.g. Danny Zuko in Grease), its use on screen shifted with growing awareness of health impacts. Regulations limited its presence, and depictions changed. Broadly speaking, it became a symbol of weakness, struggle or villainy.
How is plastic portrayed on screen? A 2021 PPC study found that 93% of plastic shown in a sample of popular TV and films from 2019-2020 was not disposed of on screen. Of the 7% that was disposed of, 80% was littered. This gives the audience two messages:
That plastic simply “disappears”.
Irresponsible disposal, like littering, is acceptable.
Since then, knowledge about plastic’s impact on our planet, climate and health has grown massively and the public’s attitudes towards plastic have also shifted. It’s clear TV and film producers need to catch up. Let’s look at some recent popular TV shows and how they have, or haven’t, addressed single-use plastic.
Direct references to reuse culture
Hacks (2021-present) uses the age gap between young writer Ava and veteran comedian Deborah to discuss a variety of environmental issues. In early episodes, Ava chastises Deborah for always getting single-use plastic cups for fizzy drinks and persuades her to get a reusable cup instead. In “One Day” (season three, episode five), Deborah initially dismisses climate change: “the Earth is a billion years old. It just self-corrects from any damage that’s done to it…Trust me, we’re fine”. Ava gradually educates her, and in the closing scene, Deborah reprimands her makeup artists for using plastic. These conversations are not clunky or forced. As The Hollywood Reporter notes, the show seamlessly integrates “deeply felt activist stances” without sacrificing comedy.
Quietly sustainable: the power of visual cues
Of course, reuse doesn’t have to be talked about directly by the characters to have an impact. By simply showing reuse in action, Shrinking (2023 – present) and Abbott Elementary (2021- present) make it feel natural and commonplace. In Apple TV’s Shrinking, Gaby’s “emotional support water bottle” is a recurring feature, but its environmental impact is not explicitly mentioned. Instead, the characters discuss how hydrated Gaby is, and she uses it as a way to bond with one of her colleagues.
Planet-friendly behaviour is seen regularly in Disney’s Abbot Elementary. The teachers all have reusable coffee cups, the staff car share or walk to events, and there is a school garden project. While some single-use items are still present on screen, in general, sustainable choices are the default option without making any particular fuss about it. Having popular, likeable characters associated with reuse sends a powerful message to audiences.
In comparison, Only Murders in the Building (2021 – present), like most shows, missed an opportunity to show reuse as a standard option. The Disney show centres around a friendship between Charles and Oliver, in their 70s, and Mabel, in her early 30s. They frequently use disposable coffee cups and cutlery. Like in Hacks, the writers could have used the age gap to spark conversations about reuse. For example, Mabel could carry a reusable coffee cup while Oliver and Charles take single-use – the outdated option. Or they could have had characters of all ages using reusable cups and cutlery – normalising the behaviour across generations.
Perhaps in the future we might even see whole reuse systems in action in popular TV shows and movies?
Behind the scenes
Who can forget the famous Starbucks coffee cup left on set in Game of Thrones? The TV and film industry is known for waste. A typical 60-day shoot uses 39,000 single-use water bottles. On top of that, large quantities of disposable plastic plates, utensils and coffee cups are used every day on set. Quinta Brunson, creator, writer and star of Abbott Elementary, has been open about the need for change in the industry. She is leading by example, providing reusable water bottles for everyone on her set. Lucia Aniello, showrunner for Hacks, also supports sustainability. She worked with the studio to reduce waste by eliminating plastic water bottles on set and having characters repeat outfits. Changes we want to see on screen should be mirrored by changes off screen.
What needs to happen?
Given the well-documented health and environmental harms of plastics, the way they are portrayed on screen needs to be addressed. Producers should consider their depiction with the same responsibility now applied to tobacco and alcohol. If they acknowledged their duty it would undoubtedly help to make sustainable behaviours more mainstream. It would also reflect the attitudes of growing numbers in their audiences who are concerned about single-use plastics.
As viewers, we should be aware of how single-use plastic is portrayed on screen. The Begley-Cohen Test, developed by the PPC, encourages the critical evaluation of single-use plastic in the media.
To pass the test, the following criteria must be met:
No single-use plastics appear on the screen
If single-use plastic does appear on the screen, it is portrayed or discussed as problematic
Try it on the next thing you watch and share your findings! The stories we see on screen can be shaped by pressure from the people who watch them. Films and TV shows are both a reflection and an important driver of aspirations. And what better goal to have than a world free from plastic pollution?
The growing problem of plastic pollution, which includes contributions from Switzerland, makes the transition to a circular economy an urgent priority. Therefore, a coalition of 10 Swiss non-governmental organisations (NGOs), including Trash Hero World, is calling for an ambitious overhaul of beverage packaging regulations. In a joint statement to the Federal Council on 6 March 2025, these organisations called on Switzerland to live up to its pioneering role and implement strong, binding measures based on international best practices and the latest independent science.
The statement said it is high time for Switzerland to put its words into action when it comes to the circular economy. Compared to the European Union and other pioneers, Switzerland still has a long way to go. A circular economy requires a significant reduction in plastic production and the widespread introduction of reuse systems, otherwise, the problem of plastic pollution will continue to worsen. The current situation also poses a risk to public health: plastics and the toxic chemicals they contain are contaminating the environment, food, and even the human body, as countless scientific studies worldwide demonstrate.
Four demands to break the plastics deadlock
Avoid or, at the very least, reduce plastic pollution at the source: Binding reduction targets and comprehensive monitoring of measures, ban unnecessary and toxic plastics, and promote reuse.
End greenwashing and ensure complete transparency: Mandatory disclosure of packaging ingredients, full traceability of plastics, and a ban on misleading claims of alleged environmental friendliness.
Significant investments in reusable packaging and the circular economy: Development of a large-scale reuse infrastructure, financed at least in part through extended producer responsibility (EPR).
Protection of public health: Strict ban on hazardous substances in all plastics, including recycled materials.
These demands were set out in detail in a joint statement submitted to the Federal Council.
Why act now?
Excessive production: More than one million tonnes of plastic are produced in Switzerland each year, a significant portion of which is incinerated or pollutes the environment.
Ubiquity of microplastics: These particles have been detected in Swiss drinking water, air, and soil. Some substances have even been detected in the human body (blood, lungs, breast milk, testicles, brain cells, etc.).
International momentum: The European Union is taking ambitious measures to reduce plastic pollution; Switzerland must not only keep pace but also be ambitious. Those who declare themselves to be international leaders must set a good example.
Public support: According to a recent survey, over 80% of the Swiss population supports strict measures against plastic pollution.
Statements from the signatory NGOs
Roman Peter, President of Trash Hero World
“People have a right to know what’s in their packaging. Plastic contains toxins that migrate into food and expose families to numerous health risks. We need full disclosure, clear labeling, and a ban on the worst offenders to protect public health.”
Fabienne McLellan, Executive Director of OceanCare
“The increasing production of virgin plastic and the excessive consumption of plastic, including in Switzerland, contribute to the waste of global resources and environmental pollution. If Switzerland wants to make an international contribution to combating the flood of plastic, it must also start with itself and set a good example. The circular economy can make an important contribution here if we are willing to take further measures and admit that plastic is only partially recyclable. We cannot avoid tackling problematic plastics and plastic products. The Beverage Packaging Ordinance offers Switzerland the opportunity to demonstrate internationally that it is following up on its diplomatic commitment.”
Joëlle Hérin, Consumer and Circular Economy Expert – Greenpeace Switzerland
“Scientists are increasingly concerned about the presence of microplastics in the human body, as well as our exposure to the problematic chemicals they contain. If the federal government cares about our health, it is essential to expand reuse, eliminate unnecessary single-use packaging and products, and ban hazardous substances in plastics.”
Global context: a golden opportunity
International negotiations for a legally binding global treaty against plastic pollution are underway. Switzerland will play a central role by hosting the fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5.2), scheduled to take place from 5 – 14 August 2025, at the Palais des Nations in Geneva. This session will be preceded by regional consultations on 4 August 2025. Switzerland is also a candidate to host the future secretariat of this international treaty. In this context, it would be inconsistent for Switzerland to maintain outdated and inadequate plastic regulations. The NGOs therefore call on the Federal Council to revise the beverage packaging ordinance to give a strong signal: a signal from a country that is taking the lead in the global fight against plastic pollution.
Rahel SchaubPlastic pollution: Swiss NGO coalition calls for ambitious reform
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.