Why plastic recycling is broken

by Seema on 18/03/2024 No comments

Yes, you read that right: unfortunately, recycling more is not going to solve the problem of plastic pollution. Here are the twins with why:

 

Quite a few different points were mentioned in that conversation. Let’s break them down.

Plastic is difficult and expensive to recycle

Recycling plastic is tough because there are thousands of different types, colours, and additives – just think of the average supermarket shelf! All the different plastics usually get collected together and sorting them out at the factory is expensive and not always effective.

Inaccurate sorting leads to contamination, where a whole batch of plastic might need to be thrown away. It also means any recycled products are lower quality and need new plastic (from fossil fuels) mixed in to make them work.

The sorting and treatments needed to make recycled plastic also make it expensive to sell – it usually costs more than brand new or virgin plastic. This means it is often not cost-effective for companies to switch to using recycled plastic.

Recycling arrows are meaningless

Those little symbols with arrows on plastic packaging might make us feel good, but they’re not a guarantee that the plastic can be or will be recycled.

If the arrows you see have a number inside, this is the symbol to show the general type of plastic it’s made from. There are 6 basic types:

1. PET (Polyethylene Terephthalate)
2. HDPE (High-Density Polyethylene)
3. PVC (Polyvinyl Chloride)
4. LDPE (Low-Density Polyethylene)
5. PP (Polypropylene)
6. PS (Polystyrene)

The seventh type is “Other”, which means “everything else” – thousands of varieties! Only 2 of these types, #1 (PET) and #2 (HDPE) can be effectively recycled, yet all the numbers are shown with arrows around them. How misleading is that?

Plastic recycling is not infinite

Unlike some materials like glass or metal, plastic can only be recycled once or twice before it degrades too much to be useful. So, it’s not a never-ending cycle like we might hope.

Nope, that’s still not going around…

The way plastics behave and the high risk of contamination mean – if it can be recycled at all – it usually gets downcycled. In other words, it gets turned into a different kind of product from its original use. For example, plastic bottles (made from PET) are often downcycled into clothing or carpets. Plastic bags (made from LDPE) can get downcycled into waste bins or garden furniture. These new products can’t be recycled further so they eventually end up in landfill, incinerated or in nature.

Around 2% of plastic is effectively recycled, which means it gets turned into something similar to its original use, so a plastic bottle to a plastic bottle. But this only adds 1 or 2 extra “loops” to its life – after that this plastic too will degrade and get thrown away.

Plastic recycling is not safe

As we know, plastic contains a lot of chemical additives – sometimes half or more of the material weight. Around 16,000 different substances have been identified in plastics but very little is known about any of them, let alone what happens when we mix them up with others in the recycling process.

Scientists are worried because they have found dangerous chemicals such as flame retardants in recycled plastic cooking utensils This is a problem because they are in contact with our food.

Recycling plastic also means grinding, shredding, and heating the materials, which exposes workers to more of these harmful chemicals through skin contact and breathing in fumes and microplastics. In many countries, they don’t get proper protection to keep them safe, nor healthcare to help deal with the impacts.

There’s way too much plastic to recycle

Let’s not forget the original problem with plastic: we’re churning it out at an alarming rate, far faster than we can actually recycle it. And most of the time, we don’t even want to recycle it because recycling is difficult and expensive.

This means a lot of it ends up being shipped to poorer countries to deal with. This is called the waste trade. But why would they want other people’s trash? Well, sometimes they are promised money for it, or sometimes it is (falsely) labelled as useful items.

Either way, when it arrives, the companies who got the money for it usually end up dumping or burning it, even if they promised to recycle it. It’s an unfair system that puts an unfair burden on developing countries, who often don’t have the facilities to deal with their domestic waste, let alone more from abroad.

In summary, when we say plastic recycling is broken, we mean that there is both too much plastic and too many different types to handle with recycling. The material itself is not designed to be recycled, so it’s expensive to do, not safe and the quality deteriorates each time. This means more new plastic needs to be made to replace it, which defeats the purpose of recycling.

To find out more about plastic recycling and how it works, check out our reading and watch lists below. Take your time to explore whatever appeals to you. You can also apply your new knowledge in an activity, or test it out in the quiz. If you have any thoughts on plastic and our health, or want to answer the question below, leave us a comment!

❗ TRY THIS

Do some research online or offline: what types of plastic (and other materials) can be recycled in your area? Do you know what happens to the recycling after it reaches the plant?

Was this info easy to find out? Do you think it could be more transparent?


Want to test your knowledge about plastic recycling?

TAKE THE QUIZ!

❓ OVER TO YOU

Recycling plastic is not the same as recycling other materials like metal or glass. Can you explain why?

💡 Consider the economic, health and social reasons.

Let us know your thoughts below!
Note: comments are moderated so they won’t appear right away

read more
SeemaWhy plastic recycling is broken

Quiz | How does plastic cause climate change?

by Seema on 11/03/2024 No comments


How does plastic cause climate change?

A quick quiz to test the knowledge you learned in Educate Yourself | Zero Waste - Part 4

Which phase of the plastic lifecycle contributes the most to greenhouse gas emissions?(Required)
How does plastic in landfills affect climate change?(Required)
How does plastic in the ocean affect climate change?(Required)
How does the incineration of plastic waste affect climate change?(Required)
Why do fossil fuel companies see plastic as the future?(Required)

read more
SeemaQuiz | How does plastic cause climate change?

How plastic causes climate change

by Seema on 11/03/2024 No comments

Plastic isn’t just a pollution and public health problem; it’s the fastest growing industrial source of greenhouse gas emissions on the planet!

Yikes. It’s true: the production, use and disposal of plastics are now estimated to contribute up to 8% of global greenhouse gas emissions each year, compared with the whole aviation industry (estimated at around 3.5% of emissions). This doesn’t mean it’s okay to take the plane when there’s an alternative option! It’s just to give you an idea of the scale of the problem.

But how is that amount of emissions even possible? By now, we know plastic is made of fossil fuels + chemicals. In the 1950s, when it first came into wider use, plastic accounted for less than 1% of global oil consumption. These days it uses around 7% and this is projected to increase to 20% by 2050. This is because big oil companies believe making more plastic will save their profits as the world moves away from fossil fuels to towards renewable sources of energy.

To understand the climate impacts of plastic though, we don’t just look at its ingredients. We need to consider its whole journey, from how it’s made to what happens after it’s thrown away – a.k.a. its lifecycle. This gives us a much fuller picture.

Let’s break down the hidden emissions during the lifecycle of plastic.

EMISSIONS FROM EXTRACTION & PRODUCTION

Plastic’s journey begins with the extraction of fossil fuels from the Earth, which emits greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane. The refining and manufacturing processes (the cracking and polymerisation we learned about in Part 1) then release more CO2 and other pollutants into the atmosphere. Around 90% of the greenhouse gas emissions associated with plastic are created at this production stage.

Plastic is also transported at every stage of its life and this uses more fossil fuels.

EMISSIONS FROM DISPOSAL

The endless stream of plastic packages and products we deal with every day will usually end up either in a landfill or incinerated. A small amount gets recycled. And a lot of plastic also gets into the environment – there’s more about that below.

Landfilling plastic, especially when mixed up with food waste and other organic material, creates conditions where methane is produced. Methane – which you may know from cow farts – is a greenhouse gas that’s way better than CO2 at trapping heat in the atmosphere. It makes climate change happen at a much faster rate.

Landfills are the world’s third largest source of methane emissions (cows and other agriculture come in – appropriately – at no. 2, with energy production taking the top spot). Making sure food waste doesn’t end up with plastic and other non-organic material in the landfill would reduce this a lot.

Incinerating plastic is a big problem. As it’s made from fossil fuels, it has the same climate impacts as burning oil and gas, with added toxic chemicals being released – often near where people live.

A small amount of plastic gets recycled and this process generates some greenhouse gas emissions, but far less than when new plastic is produced. In theory, that makes recycling more plastic a good option to slow climate change. But there are other issues with plastic recycling, which we’ll see later, that mean it’s not as helpful as we might think.

EMISSIONS FROM PLASTIC IN THE ENVIRONMENT

Scientists have found that plastic in the environment reacts with sunlight to release methane and other greenhouse gases. Microplastics are also a climate problem in the atmosphere and in the ocean. In the atmosphere, microplastics can trap heat, just like other types of air pollution.

In the ocean, there’s a different effect. Marine ecosystems help to absorb and store around half of the carbon dioxide on our planet, making them the world’s biggest “carbon sink”.

A lot of this CO2 is captured by plankton and other microorganisms in the water and then transported to the deep ocean in their poo. But the increase of microplastics in their diet is interfering with this process. As the water becomes more contaminated, less carbon dioxide can be absorbed. This threatens not only the climate, but the balance and even the survival of these beautiful and important ecosystems.

In summary, we might say that plastic has important and often unexpected negative effects on the climate at every stage of its life. The largest part of its impact comes when new plastic is produced, but it continues to create emissions after it is thrown away. It can even interfere with the planet’s natural processes to capture CO2 in the ocean.

To find out more about plastic’s impacts on climate change, check out our reading and watch lists below. Take your time to explore whatever appeals to you. You can also apply your new knowledge in an activity, or test it out in the quiz. If you have any thoughts on plastic and our health, or want to answer the question below, leave us a comment!

❗ TRY THIS

Can you draw a diagram of the lifecycle of plastic? Remember to include all the stages from the extraction of raw materials, to production, use and disposal – and any others you can think of. You might find it helpful to label each stage with the different impacts we’ve learned about so far.

Would you make your diagram in the shape of a line or a circle? Why?


Want to test your knowledge about plastic and climate?

TAKE THE QUIZ!

❓ OVER TO YOU

Oil companies are often accused of choosing profits over people and planet. Do you agree with this statement?

💡 Think about which of these 3 goals would be important for you.

Let us know your thoughts below!
Note: comments are moderated so they won’t appear right away

read more
SeemaHow plastic causes climate change

Quiz | How does plastic harm nature?

by Seema on 04/03/2024 No comments

A quick quiz to test the knowledge you learned in Educate Yourself | Zero Waste - Part 2

Why do some animals mistake plastic for food?(Required)
Why is it dangerous for animals to get entangled in plastic?(Required)
How is it possible for plastic to pollute an entire ecosystem?(Required)
How do the chemicals in plastic affect animals?(Required)
Why is it so hard for plastic to biodegrade (break down naturally)?(Required)

read more
SeemaQuiz | How does plastic harm nature?

Quiz | How does plastic get into your body?

by Seema on 04/03/2024 No comments

How does plastic get into your body?

A quick quiz to test the knowledge you learned in Educate Yourself | Zero Waste - Part 3

What are microplastics?(Required)
How do microplastics typically enter the environment?(Required)
How can humans be exposed to microplastics?(Required)
What is bioaccumulation in relation to microplastics?(Required)
How can microplastics affect human health?(Required)

read more
SeemaQuiz | How does plastic get into your body?

How plastic gets into your body

by Seema on 04/03/2024 No comments

If you’ve checked out the previous two parts of this series, you’ll already have heard of microplastics.
Microplastics – and their even tinier cousins, nanoplastics – may be small but they are a really big deal!

In this episode we’ll be finding out why, where they come from, and how they even get into our bodies in the first place.

Scientists usually define microplastics as any piece of plastic under 5mm (or half a centimetre) in length. Some of them are visible but most are too tiny to be seen, going down to just 1 micron (or one thousandth of a millimetre) across. When they get under this size, they are usually called nanoplastics. But to keep things simple, for now we’ll just call them all “microplastics”.

WHERE DO MICROPLASTICS COME FROM?

Most microplastics start life as part of something bigger. As these items get produced, used and thrown away, microplastics are released. This usually happens in 3 ways:

Friction: two of the biggest sources of microplastics are textiles and car tyres. Making, washing and wearing clothes made from synthetic fibres like polyester or acrylic releases tiny microfibres. So too does making, walking or sitting on synthetic carpets and furniture. And when people drive, the friction between their tyres and the road surface creates tiny particles of microplastic dust (if you thought tyres were only made from rubber, think again – they are about 1/4 plastic). In a 2020 study, 78% of microplastics in the ocean were found to come from tyres!

When any plastic gets hot and comes into contact with other things, the surface breaks down much more easily, for example when cooking with plastic utensils, microwaving a ready meal, or putting your fleece in the dryer.

Fragmentation: when plastic gets old, or is exposed to things like sunlight or wave action, it can get brittle and start to break up into smaller and smaller pieces. This happens very often in the ocean or in open dumpsites, but also on farmland, where plastic is used to cover crops.

Incineration: Burning plastic along with other waste is a common way of managing the trash we produce. This creates a lot of microplastics both in the emissions and in the ash left behind.

Other microplastics, like glitter, start off small – and get smaller over time. Liquid plastics are common ingredients in toiletries like lotions, makeup, hair conditioners and toothpaste, where they are used to bulk out the product and to make your hair and body smooth and shiny. These all wash into the water system as microplastics after use.

Nurdles are small pellets of plastic used to make plastic products. Millions of tons are made every year and transported all over the globe, but accidental spills or careless handling mean many of them end up in the environment, where they can break down even further.

HOW DO MICROPLASTICS GET INTO OUR BODIES?

Some very small microplastics, like tyre dust or textile fibres, can float unnoticed in the air. While some will eventually settle, there’s so much new material arriving and being blown around, the whole atmosphere is full of it – both indoors and outdoors. You’re definitely breathing in plastic right now.

Any size of microplastic can enter the soil and water, either directly or through the sewage system. This means both plants and animals are exposed to microplastics and, as we eat plants and animals, the microplastic ends up in our bodies too. Because microplastics are so widespread and so tiny, this is not something we can see or control.

Then of course we’re also spreading microplastics on our skin, hair and nails and consuming more of them directly when we buy, cook and eat food and drinks wrapped in plastic.

WHAT ARE THE EFFECTS OF HAVING MICROPLASTICS IN YOUR BODY?

Scientists are still studying all the effects microplastics might have on our health. The main issue is with all the chemical additives used to make plastic. These additives can make up more than half of a plastic material!

A lot of research has shown that these chemicals can be toxic and also affect the way our hormones work. This can lead to an increased risk of diabetes, obesity, heart disease, some types of cancer, birth defects, premature birth, brain disorders, and infertility.

The pieces of plastic themselves can lead to inflammation or damage to our organs, especially if we’re exposed to a lot of them over time. They can also prevent the proper absorption of nutrients from our food.

Because plastic is synthetic, not natural, our bodies don’t know how to break it down. So once it’s in our lungs, blood or tissues, it just stays there. As more arrives, the concentration builds up. This is called bioaccumulation.

In summary, microplastics usually come from bigger pieces of plastic breaking down, and they can get into our bodies through the food we eat, the water we drink, and the air we breathe. Once they are there, we can’t easily get rid of them and they can impact our health in both chemical and physical ways.

This is a really big topic and you’ll find a lot more information and explanation in the reading / watch lists below. Take your time and check out whatever appeals to you. You can also apply your new knowledge in an activity, or test it out in the quiz. If you have any thoughts on plastic and our health, or want to answer the question below, leave us a comment!

❗ TRY THIS

Microplastics expose us to toxic chemicals. One way you can limit this exposure is by checking if the cosmetic or hygiene products you use contain microplastics here.
If they do, once they are used up, try to look for more natural alternatives.

Can you think of any other ways to reduce your exposure?


Want to test your knowledge about plastic and health?

TAKE THE QUIZ!

❓ OVER TO YOU

Our bodies are not designed to process synthetic chemicals. Do you think companies are right to keep using them in products if we don’t yet know their effects?

💡 Consider whether the benefits outweigh the risks. What if the potential damage is irreversible?

Some scientists say we should use “the precautionary principle”, which means if there is a risk of irreversible harm, we should avoid the action. But others argue being too careful stops innovation.

Let us know your opinion below!
Note: comments are moderated so they won’t appear right away

read more
SeemaHow plastic gets into your body

Quiz | What’s the problem with plastic?

by Seema on 20/02/2024 No comments

A quick quiz to test the knowledge you learned in Educate Yourself | Zero Waste - Part 1

What are the main ingredients of plastic?(Required)
How many different chemicals have been found in plastic?(Required)
Which of the following does NOT normally contain plastic?(Required)
Why is it so hard for plastic to biodegrade (break down naturally)?(Required)
We are currently facing many problems in the living world. Which of these problems is made worse by increased plastic production?(Required)

read more
SeemaQuiz | What’s the problem with plastic?

How does plastic harm the living world?

by Seema on 12/02/2024 No comments

Take a look at this:

Did any of the conversation in the video surprise you? Most people are only aware about sea creatures being harmed by plastic, but the reality is a lot worse. Let’s take a look.

HOW EXACTLY DOES PLASTIC HARM NATURE?

As we learned in the first part of our series, plastic is made from fossil fuels and chemicals – and it’s virtually indestructible in natural conditions. It’s exactly these characteristics that make it so dangerous for natural ecosystems and the life within them. Here are the five main ways plastic can harm the living world:

1. Entanglement: Plastic fishing nets, six-pack rings, and shopping bags are all common items that animals can get tangled up in – and there are many more. It’s often hard for them to escape and, aside from causing stress, it can make it difficult or impossible for them to swim, fly, or escape predators. Entanglement can also cause injuries or even death.

2. Ingestion: Many animals, such as sea turtles, birds, and fish, mistake plastic debris for food, either because it looks or smells like what they normally eat. A plastic bag floating underwater can look like a jellyfish, for example. And in the sea, plastic pieces get covered in algae and start to smell like small fish called krill. On land, especially in urban areas, there are other animals who scavenge for food, such as stray dogs, raccoons, monkeys and even elephants or camels. The food they find often gets eaten together with the plastic bags or packaging it comes in. When animals eat any kind of plastic, their digestive systems can get blocked, causing slow starvation. It can also lead to internal injuries and infections.

3. Chemical contamination: The harmful chemicals in plastics can leach out into the environment over time, as they are exposed to sunlight, water and other substances. These chemicals contaminate the water and soil. They can even start to build up in the tissues of animals that eat or come into contact with the plastic. Eventually this will lead to health problems or reproductive issues, as many of the chemicals in plastic affect how hormones function.

4. Habitat destruction: As well as contaminating the soil and water, plastic pollution can smother habitats such as coral reefs, seagrass beds, and wetlands. This suffocates the plant life, which in turn reduces the food and shelter for the various species that live there, leading to an imbalance in the ecosystem and a loss of biodiversity. Healthy ecosystems are essential for supporting human life and reducing climate change, as well as just being wondrous and beautiful parts of our planet.

5. Microplastic ingestion: Once in the environment, larger pieces of plastic break down into smaller fragments called microplastics. These enter the air, soil and water and become more easily eaten by a wide range of organisms, from plankton to whales. Microplastics can accumulate in the food chain, potentially reaching levels that can harm animals and humans.

In summary, we might say that plastic is a danger to the living world because it is both synthetic (not occurring in nature) and toxic (containing harmful chemicals). It cannot be broken down by natural processes.

Large pieces of plastic can stop living things and ecosystems from functioning properly from the outside by entangling or suffocating them. Large and small pieces of plastic can also cause damage from the inside either from physically blocking or injuring animals’ digestive systems or through chemical contamination of soil, water, air and living tissue.

To learn more about the impacts of plastics on nature and how they get into the environment in the first place, you’ll find lots of info in the reading / watch lists below. Take your time and check out whatever appeals to you. Some of the videos may feel a bit overwhelming, so take the time to record your thoughts in a journal or video diary – this helps to process any strong feelings. You can also test your knowledge in the quiz. And don’t forget to let us know your thoughts on this topic in the comments.

❗ TRY THIS

Write down or record your thoughts and feelings after watching the videos in the playlist.

You might want to take some action. You might feel sad, angry or overwhelmed. Be honest – any feelings are normal and ok.


Could you explain your new knowledge to another person?

TRY THE QUIZ!

❓ OVER TO YOU

Stopping litter can save some animals from harm, but plastic gets into nature in many other ways (check out our watchlist). Can you explain what they are?

💡 Remember, everything in the living world is connected and not everything can be seen.

Give us your summary in the comments below!
Note: comments are moderated so they won’t appear right away

read more
SeemaHow does plastic harm the living world?

What’s the problem with plastic?

by Seema on 02/02/2024 No comments

Before you start reading, take a few minutes to think: how would YOU answer this question? Most people have seen news stories about the plastic in our oceans that is harming animals. But are there any other issues? Maybe you see the problem not with plastic itself, but with the fact that people aren’t disposing of it properly or recycling enough.

To help us think it through, let’s look at the material itself.

WHAT EXACTLY IS PLASTIC?

Plastic is a mixture of fossil fuels and chemicals. First, refined crude oil or gas is put under high heat and pressure to “crack” the hydrocarbon molecules into simpler versions called monomers (mono = single). Examples of fossil fuel monomers are styrene or ethylene. These are then fused together to form polymers (poly = many), with names like polystyrene or polyethylene.

These polymers are finally melted together with various chemicals to form plastics. Each plastic product has a special recipe of polymers and chemicals that makes it more or less shiny, transparent, hard, flexible, heat-resistant etc. Plastic can also be mixed with other materials like foil or paper. Scientists have identified more than 16,000 different chemicals in plastics that we use today, and very few are known to be safe for humans. Companies currently don’t need to tell anyone what’s inside the plastic they make.

You can find out more about this process and how plastic was invented in the reading and watch lists below.

WHAT IS PLASTIC USED FOR?

Probably the easier question to answer is what isn’t plastic used for?! In a few decades, it has taken over the world. Aside from obvious uses like soft drinks bottles or straws, plastic can be found in everything from clothes to paint and even in products we use on our face and body. Some plastic things can be used for a long time, like car doors. But most plastic things we use only once, often for just a few seconds, like a coffee stirrer.

WHAT HAPPENS TO PLASTIC AFTER WE’RE FINISHED USING IT?

Because it’s manmade, plastic doesn’t act like other materials when it’s thrown away. The polymers are tightly fused together and mixed in with a lot of different chemicals so it can’t break down naturally. Recycling it is tricky – as we’ll see later on. Burning it releases those chemicals into the atmosphere, along with all the regular greenhouse gases from the fossil fuel it’s made from.

Basically, every piece of plastic ever made still exists on Earth in some form. Your toothbrush will easily outlive your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandchildren 😀

In summary, we might say the problem with plastic is that there is way too much of it being produced.
That’s an issue because of what it’s made from – fossil fuel and toxic chemicals – and how it acts.

Here are the twins with more:

 

In the video, we hear there are three main impacts of plastic – and all of them affect you in some way.

  • Plastic destroys ecosystems
  • Plastic affects your health
  • Plastic accelerates climate change

We’ll be looking at these in depth in the next parts of the series. Until then, you’ll find a lot of great info in the reading / watch lists below. Take your time and check out whatever appeals to you. You can also apply your new knowledge in an activity, or test it out in the quiz. Don’t forget to let us know your thoughts on this topic below.

❗ TRY THIS

Look around you, where do you see plastic? It’s not always obvious! But once you start looking, you might start to see it everywhere… You’re probably wearing it, drinking or eating from it, working, playing and even washing with it. Can you reach 100+ things in one day?

What things do you / your family buy in plastic? Or that contain plastic?
How many of those things are single-use?
Start to keep a list if you like. It might come in handy later.


Feel confident with your new knowledge?

TAKE THE QUIZ!

❓ OVER TO YOU

Plastic is everywhere in our lives but it’s causing a lot of problems. What do you think we can do about this?

💡 Think about what plastic is used for. Are all of these things necessary?

Let us know in the comments below!
Note: comments are moderated so they won’t appear right away

read more
SeemaWhat’s the problem with plastic?

Plastics treaty must not go the way of the climate convention

by Seema on 29/11/2023 No comments

The third of five rounds of negotiations for the Global Plastics Treaty in Nairobi ended in confusion and uncertainty last week. Trash Hero was there and reports on the key takeaways from the meeting.


K E Y   O U T C O M E S
– The draft text of the treaty was made more complicated, not simplified
– No working groups will be set up to look at terms and definitions before the next meeting
– Oil-producing countries again attempted to delay and derail proceedings
– Importantly, they did not succeed in any meaningful way
– Wastepickers and indigenous groups achieved greater recognition for their roles


It was again a huge honour to represent our volunteers from 11 – 19 Nov 2023 at the UNEP headquarters in Nairobi and take my place alongside committed and knowledgeable colleagues in the Break Free From Plastic, GAIA and IPEN networks. (To understand why Trash Hero was there and what the talks were about, see Background, below).

The nine-day proceedings were intense, starting early morning and often finishing late at night. Discussions (in so-called “Contact Groups”) on different parts of the treaty text happened simultaneously in different parts of the building, which made them challenging to follow. At times progress was frustratingly slow and, despite many countries taking strong positions, it was not enough to overcome the blocking tactics of more powerful nations, with vested interests in continued plastic production.

Trash Hero met with many delegates, including those from Switzerland and Thailand, both of whom deserve mention for their strong stances on identifying the toxic chemicals in plastic. A joint proposal to advance work on chemicals and polymers of concern before INC-4 received support from 130 countries present, even though it ultimately failed to pass.

Access remained an issue at the daily Asia-Pacific regional meetings, which barred observers from attending – in contrast with the meetings of other regional groups, which are open to all participants. The Asia-Pacific region stretches from the Gulf States in the west to the Small Island Developing States in the Pacific Ocean and some members do not see the need for transparency and civil society participation.

During breaks in the official meetings, there were many side events, where we heard from experts on topics such as plastic and health and reuse systems, as well as from waste pickers and indigenous leaders, who shared their perspectives on a just transition.

INC-3 MEETING SUMMARY

Prior to the meeting, the INC Secretariat had prepared two documents, intended to form the basis of discussions:

  1. The “Zero Draft” text, based on the outcomes of INC-2. This provided a clear structure for the treaty. Each part proposed a broad yet concise set of options, ranging from strict, globally-enforced rules to voluntary commitments, dependent on each country’s particular circumstances.
  2. A “Synthesis Report“, an additional document containing recommended text for definitions, scope, principles and other items submitted by member states that had not yet been discussed by the INC.

The expectation before INC-3, based on the usual negotiating process for these kinds of agreements, was that member states would do two readings of these documents, discussing and expressing preferences for the different options. The goal was to move forward with a mandate to create a streamlined First Draft, reflecting the common ground and supporting detailed text negotiation at INC-4.

The second expectation was that member states would agree to carry out intersessional work – meetings in between the official rounds of negotiation – to discuss (among others) how they would define specific terms, establish targets, categorise chemicals and propose means of financing that could be used later in the negotiations, without prejudging the final outcome. This work is essential for member states to understand what is meant when the treaty refers, for example, to “chemicals of concern” or “safe, environmentally sound disposal”. It also brings independent science and expertise into the process, which has thus far been lacking.

However instead of a mandate for a first draft and intersessional work, what we actually got in Nairobi was quite different.

Should there be any doubt remaining about the intentions of oil-producing countries after the derailment of INC-2, INC-3 proved that this same minority continue to negotiate in bad faith. Branding themselves as the “like-minded group” of countries, they started by calling into question the “balance” of the Zero Draft and the Synthesis Report, then insisted that the existing text be expanded to take into account all views in the room. This was necessary, they said, in order to establish trust moving forward.

It resulted in chaos. Hundreds of amendments to the text were submitted within a matter of hours. The vast majority of these were designed to weaken the provisions or, in some cases, delete them entirely. The Secretariat scrambled to accommodate all the changes over the remaining days. Precious time was spent simply trying to establish whether the inputs had been recorded correctly.

What we are now left with is a bloated, 100+ page document (compared with the 30 pages of the original Zero Draft), with each of the original clauses expanded to include several, often confusing and contradictory options. This is not allowed to be streamlined or summarised, only edited for typos. It will be published by the Secretariat as a “Revised Zero Draft” by 31 December 2023. The only positive from the expansion is that support for waste pickers is now more clearly recognised and included throughout the text.

Meanwhile, similar stalling tactics meant there will be no intersessional work before INC-4. The topics for discussion and the format could not be agreed. The same minority of countries wanted to leave key issues like polymers, chemicals and EPR (extended producer responsibility) off the table and focus solely on waste management and finance. This will delay progress at INC-4 as no groundwork on terms and definitions will have been done.

The final outcome of the meeting was that a new Chair of the INC Secretariat was elected. Luis Vayas Valdivieso of Ecuador will replace outgoing Chair, Gustavo Meza-Cuadra of Peru, and preside over INC-4, 5 and beyond.

Analysis by CIEL identified at least 143 participants at the talks as members of the fossil fuel and petrochemical industries, outnumbering the representatives of the 70 smallest country delegations. Six member states, including Malaysia, hosted industry lobbyists as part of their official delegations.

Oil producing countries’ delegations in general tended to be far larger than those of the self-styled “downstream” countries, who suffer most from plastic pollution. This gave them an unfair advantage when it came to following the simultaneous discussions, speaking at the various Contact Groups, drafting submissions at speed and accessing technical and tactical assistance.

WHAT HAPPENS NOW?

On the surface, it may seem like the plastics treaty is going in the same direction as the climate change convention (UNFCCC), which is struggling to make a meaningful impact almost thirty years after its adoption.

We are seeing the same dominance of fossil fuel interests; the failure of the countries responsible for the crisis to take the lead in solving it; and the familiar move towards “pledges” based on “national circumstances” instead of a commitment to the globally binding measures needed to tackle the problem at the source.

But one critical difference with the plastics treaty is that we still have the means and the will to change this pattern. The member states taking part have yet to make any conclusive decisions. Although the outcomes of INC-3 mean the final treaty is likely to be significantly delayed, it is important to remember that as yet no real concessions have been made. The original text of the Zero Draft may be buried under new suggestions, but it is still in play. Countries chose to delay intersessional work, rather than settle for partial or watered down discussions. Many observers see this as a win: no progress is better than a compromise.

And unlike UNFCCC, the INC still has the possibility to make decisions by majority voting, not consensus (unanimous agreement). Consensus decision-making is widely seen as the fatal flaw of UNFCCC, as a single country with vested interests is able to veto any proposal. If the new Chair of the INC is able to take control of the proceedings and implement a strong conflict of interest policy – similar to that which the World Health Organisation used during the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control – as well as support smaller countries to take a more active role, there is hope.

Ambition in many corners of the room – from Africa, Latin America, and small island states among others – is still high. If these member states succeed in creating a strong treaty that truly covers the whole life cycle of plastic, it will have huge implications, not only for our health and biodiversity but also for the climate and the UNFCCC. It will prove that caps on fossil fuel production are possible and that Big Oil can be defeated. Perhaps INC-4 in Ottawa will be the turning point that is so badly needed.

 


 

BACKGROUND

What is the Global Plastics Treaty?
In February 2022, the United Nations Environment Assembly made a historic resolution (UNEA 5/14) to develop “an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment” – the Global Plastics Treaty – and gave member states just five meetings in two short years to agree on the text.

With the scope of the treaty covering the whole life cycle of plastic, there is a lot of ground to cover: the ever-mounting evidence about the toxicity of plastic, from extraction to disposal; its significant role in planetary warming; its destruction of ecosystems and biodiversity; the impossibility of plastic circularity; and the disproportionate impacts of all of these issues on the Global South and vulnerable communities.

Member states must also agree on the implementation of any agreed measures – whether they will be voluntary or binding, how they will achieve compliance and how they will be financed.

Why is Trash Hero involved?
In 2022, Trash Hero World received UNEP accreditation, recognising the work of our volunteers on plastic pollution worldwide, and allowing us to join the talks as civil society observers. This means we can take part in the negotiation process, contributing both formally through written submissions and statements and informally through discussions with official government delegates. Like all observers, who represent UNEP’s “major groups” of stakeholders – farmers, local authorities, women, children and youth, scientists, workers and businesses – we are not able to vote or make any decisions.

What is INC-3?
INC stands for Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee, the group of around 175 UN member states who will decide on the form and content of the treaty, facilitated by a Bureau and Secretariat made up of UNEP staff and representatives of member states, who act in a neutral capacity.

The whole process is funded by member states, primarily from the Global North.

INC-3 is the third round of meetings of the INC, and the longest to date. It officially took place from 11 – 19 November 2023 (including two days of preparatory meetings) in the UN compound in Nairobi, Kenya. More than 1900 people were in attendance representing 161 countries and 318 observer organisations. The final two planned meetings of INC take place in Ottawa, Canada in April 2024 and in Seoul, S. Korea, in November 2024.

read more
SeemaPlastics treaty must not go the way of the climate convention