September 2026 : Environment news round-up

by Fayrouz on 29/09/2026 No comments

Our round-up of the month’s most important stories.

McDonald’s must switch to reusable cups in the Netherlands 

Acting on an enforcement request from an environmental NGO, Dutch authorities found that the chain had been breaking plastic packaging laws in place since 2024. They must now provide reusable cups for dine-in customers by January 2027, or face fines of up to €3.75 million.

 

Almost 900 pieces of plastic found inside a single seabird   

A 15-year study tracking plastic in shearwaters in Australia has found a record-breaking 894 pieces of plastic in one young bird – the equivalent of finding 12kg of plastic inside an 80kg human. The birds’ plastic consumption has increased dramatically over the last 5 years.

 

Why are plastics companies writing school lesson plans?   

US industry groups are supplying teachers with free learning resources that cast plastic as safe, essential and recyclable, according to a new report, which also finds this happens most in school districts near petrochemical facilities. Senior educators have described the industry curricula as propaganda masquerading as science.

 

Microplastics in soil act like a Trojan horse to spread toxins  

A five-year project found particles in all 227 agricultural fields tested across 11 countries, and warns their surfaces create a hotspot for interactions between plastic chemicals, microbes, pesticides and veterinary drugs, causing serious harm to the soil microbiome.

 

UN experts call for a blanket ban on non-essential use of forever chemicals  

A report presented to the Human Rights Council says we cannot wait for conclusive proof of toxicity before acting to reduce PFAS exposure. Tracking long term accumulation is highly complex, but there is already enough evidence of harm for states to take action.

 

New species and old litter found 4,000 metres under the sea  

Scientists exploring the Mar Del Plata canyon floor were able to document 40 previously unknown species, but on more than half their dives also found plastic pollution, including bags, fishing gear and snack wrappers.

 

Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.

To sign up click here.

read more
FayrouzSeptember 2026 : Environment news round-up

Microplastics in ultra-processed food: a toxic relationship on our plate

by Fayrouz on 24/09/2026 No comments

We already know ultra-processed food isn’t good for us. Instant noodles, packaged snacks, ready meals and sugary drinks: more than 75 long-term studies have now linked these foods to a long list of harms, from heart disease and diabetes to cancer and poor mental health. Unhealthy diets, in which ultra-processed foods play a major role, are tied to one in five deaths worldwide.

But there’s a second problem hiding in the same packaging, and it’s one we talk about far less. Ultra-processed foods and plastic are, in the words of one recent scientific review, in a “toxic relationship”: a co-dependent pair that generates enormous profits for both the food and petrochemical industries, at a growing cost to our health and the planet. 

Why the two go hand in hand

Cheap, light and endlessly versatile, plastic is what makes ultra-processed food possible. It wraps it, preserves it, and carries the bright branding that sells it. It lets manufacturers stretch supply chains across the world, extend shelf life and reach even the poorest consumers, all at very low cost. Around 83% of flexible food packaging and nearly half of all rigid food packaging is plastic, and ultra-processed products are commonly encased in it. 

But the link runs deeper than convenience: the two industries need each other. 

Ultra-processed foods generate large and reliable profits for big food corporations: made from low cost and often addictive ingredients, portioned up, and sold as widely as possible. Cheap plastic is what makes that business model work. 

Meanwhile ultra-processed foods give the petrochemical industry a vast and growing market for its plastic, at a time when the world is decarbonising and the energy and transport sectors are increasingly moving away from fossil fuels. The result is a profitable partnership, that neither side has much reason to give up, whatever the cost to our health or the environment.

Photo by Nico Smit on Unsplash

What’s the problem with the packaging?

That close contact also comes at a price. Plastic contains upwards of 16,000 chemicals, at least a quarter of which are known to be hazardous, like BPA, phthalates and PFAS “forever chemicals”, with the majority of the rest untested. It is also constantly shedding micro- and nanoplastics, through simple friction, heat or fragmentation.

Chemicals can migrate out of plastic packaging and into the food inside through surface contact, or through particles shedded during manufacturing and use. They migrate most efficiently in exactly the conditions ultra-processed foods supply: long storage times, small packet sizes, in contact with oily or acidic contents, or with food that is heated up in the pack. 

You can see this in the food itself. In a 2024 study by Ocean Conservancy and the University of Toronto, researchers tested 16 common protein products and found microplastics in more than 90% of them, with the more processed items carrying more. Chicken nuggets, for example, contained roughly 30 times more microplastic particles per gram than plain chicken breast. And heat makes it worse: the chemicals and particles in plastic leach into food more readily at higher temperatures – one reason not to pack, microwave or serve hot food in plastic.

Adding plastic chemicals to the existing health burden of ultra processed foods, with their high calories, low nutritional value and artificial additives, is unlikely to be good news.

What we don’t know yet

That microplastics and plastic chemicals get into our food is well established. What they do to human health over a lifetime is not. The evidence on microplastics’ health effects is, as the researchers themselves put it, “not yet conclusive.” Animal studies point strongly to possible risks for digestive, reproductive and respiratory health, hormone disruption and cancer. But there are limitations on human studies, due to the complexities of the chemicals involved, their interaction and accumulation, as well as the ethics of testing and available funding. The European Food Safety Authority, the EU’s official food-safety body, says it cannot yet draw firm conclusions, and its full risk assessment isn’t expected until the end of 2027. So we don’t yet have the proof to panic about our dinner, but we should still be paying attention to what’s on our plate. 

The unpackaged alternative

The food that carries the least plastic tends to be the food that’s better for us anyway: fresh, whole, minimally packaged ingredients, cooked from scratch.

None of this requires a special shop or a big budget: buy loose fruit and vegetables where you can, never heat or microwave food in plastic. Keep leftovers in glass, steel or ceramic instead of plastic tubs. Each of these small choices lowers your exposure to both microplastics and packaging chemicals, and nudges your diet in a healthier direction at the same time.

It’s a reminder that traditional ways of eating, built around unpackaged, local, whole foods, had something right long before “ultra-processed” was ever a word. Less plastic in, less plastic out.

The real fix: cut it at the source

Individual choices help, and they’re genuinely worth making. But as the researchers behind the “toxic relationship” review put it plainly, consumers don’t have the power to solve a problem of this scale. That responsibility lies with policymakers.

The long term solution is to redesign the industrialised system that ties food and plastic together in the first place. That means shifting towards fresh, whole and minimally processed foods that need shorter supply chains and far less packaging; scaling up reuse and refill systems in place of single-use wrapping; and holding companies accountable for the true costs of the products they sell, rather than leaving those costs to fall on our health and our environment. It also means a strong Global Plastics Treaty that limits plastic production at source and takes a full life-cycle approach, alongside proper testing and transparency for the chemicals allowed near our food. The EU has already shown that regulation can work, restricting intentionally added microplastics in products and forever chemicals in food contact materials.

Caring about what’s on our plate and caring about plastic pollution were never two separate issues. They’re the same fight: for our health and for the health of the planet.

***

Yates, J., Kadiyala, S., Deeney, M., Carriedo, A., Gillespie, S., Heindel, J.J., Maffini, M.V., Martin, O., Monteiro, C.A., Scheringer, M., Touvier, M., & Muncke, J. (2024). “A toxic relationship: ultra-processed foods & plastics.” Globalization and Health, 20:74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-024-01078-0

Baechler, B.R., Granek, E.F., Mazzotta, M., et al. (Ocean Conservancy & University of Toronto) (2024). “Microplastic concentrations in commonly consumed proteins.” Environmental Pollution. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749123022352

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). “Microplastics and nanoplastics in food.” https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/microplastics-and-nanoplastics-food

European Commission. “Global action on plastics.” https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/plastics/global-action-plastics_en

read more
FayrouzMicroplastics in ultra-processed food: a toxic relationship on our plate

August 2026 : Environment news round-up

by Fayrouz on 27/08/2026 No comments

Our round-up of the month’s most important stories.

Forever chemicals now banned from EU food packaging

The landmark ruling is an important step in protecting public health and the environment from these harmful and unnecessary chemicals; further measures being introduced include bans on certain single-use items and support for reuse and refill.

 

One year on, the plastics treaty is “going backwards”

A year after talks collapsed, a new document resulting from closed-door discussions reads like the same industry wishlist that was roundly rejected in Geneva. Key measures addressing production, chemicals and human health are still missing.

 

 

New study links microplastics to ALS 

Italian researchers found nearly twice the level of micro- and nanoplastics in the spinal fluid of ALS patients as in people without the disease, suggesting the particles may be a risk factor or potential trigger.

 

Malaysia returns over 3,000 tonnes of e-waste

Following a ban on e-waste imports in April, Malaysian authorities have uncovered 100s of falsely declared containers, and shipped them back to their countries of origin; but enforcers admit that this is just a drop in the ocean of the illegal waste trade.

 

Massive plastic pellet spill devastates English coast

The preventable spill of 17 tonnes of “nurdles” at Port of Tyne provoked an incredible volunteer cleanup response after authorities were slow to act. Calls for regulation of pellet transport have intensified following the disaster.

 

Plastic has infiltrated Amazonian wildlife

Microplastics have been found in fish, tapirs, crabs and bats deep in the Amazon, far from any city. In one lake, eight in ten fish had plastic inside them, and birds are now building nests from plastic instead of twigs.

 

 

Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.

To sign up click here.

read more
FayrouzAugust 2026 : Environment news round-up

One Year Since the Plastics Treaty Talks Collapsed. Has Anything Changed?

by Fayrouz on 26/08/2026 No comments

In August 2025, negotiators gathered in Geneva for INC-5.2, the session meant to deliver the world’s first legally binding treaty on plastic pollution. After 10 tense days of talks, more than 80 countries rejected the Chair’s final proposed draft as “unacceptable”: it set no limits on plastic production and barely addressed the chemicals of concern that make plastic pollution hazardous. The talks collapsed without agreement, no new date was set, and two months later the Chair resigned.

A year on, has the process actually moved forward, or simply moved rooms?

A new Chair, and a series of closed-door meetings

Julio Cordano of Chile was elected the new Chair of the INC in February 2026. Since then, negotiators have held several virtual meetings and one in-person gathering of Heads of Delegation. All were closed-door: no observers or press in the room.

For a treaty intended to affect every person in the world, that absence is significant. Civil society groups, scientists, Indigenous Peoples, waste pickers and other rights holders who have engaged with the process since its start have been systematically excluded from the sessions where the substance is being decided.

The new text

This closed-door process produced its first tangible output this month: an “Aid to Negotiations” text, which the Chair described as an informal reference document meant to facilitate future talks and hold “no surprises” for delegations.

The response from those who have reviewed it was critical: Break Free From Plastic members called the text a step backward that undermines the credibility of the negotiating process, arguing it fails to reflect the input gathered from member states over the past year. France described it as “disappointing” and Micronesia said it was a “lowest common denominator” document.

The Center for International Environmental Law said it had weakened ambition rather than building on the political will for strong measures already shown.

Independent legal and scientific reviewers say the new text closely resembles, and in some areas is significantly weaker than, the draft rejected a year ago. In other words, a year of private consultations has not moved the needle in any significant way.

The unresolved question

Beneath this stasis sits the dispute that sank INC-5.2: should the treaty address plastic production, or only “mismanaged” plastic waste?

The majority of states align with the treaty’s mandate to address harms across the full life cycle of plastic. They argue that a credible treaty must include production limits, on the grounds that plastic pollution starts at extraction, and downstream cleanup cannot keep pace with continued growth in production. 

A smaller bloc, led by major oil- and petrochemical-producing states, wants the treaty’s scope limited to downstream measures: waste management, recycling, and litter reduction. They claim that plastic brings immense benefits to society and is essential for “development”, while denying the science on microplastics, toxicity and human health impacts.

With this “like-minded” group also exercising their veto power at every opportunity, it is hard to see a way out of this impasse within the UN process, unless a vote (allowed in the rules of procedure) is called at the next talks.

Why production is the central issue

Global plastic production is projected to nearly triple by 2060 under current trends, by which time its emissions would be eating up almost a third of the global carbon budget designed to limit climate breakdown. Recycling plastic is inefficient and problematic, and no realistic expansion of waste infrastructure can keep up with production, nor mitigate the harms of the material itself on ecosystems and human health. 

A treaty that only addresses waste management, without tackling the source of the problem – the amount and toxicity of what is produced in the first place – would be failing the world. The “Aid to Negotiations” text is on course to do just that. 

What’s next

The calendar for the coming months is already set:

  • 27–30 September 2026: Heads of Delegation closed-door talks in Bangkok
  • 25 January – 2 February 2027: various closed-door informal consultations
  • 13–24 March 2027: INC-5.4, the next formal negotiating session

This gives negotiators roughly six months to break the deadlock.

The bottom line

A new Chair, months of private meetings, and a text that resembles the one states already rejected. One year later, the process is still being undermined by the plastics industry. 

Ambitious countries must continue to insist that the central question of whether the treaty should tackle production or just waste management, is answered by the UN mandate: to end plastic pollution “based on a comprehensive approach that addresses the full life cycle of plastic”. 

 

Sources: Break Free From Plastic, “BFFP members denounce plastic treaty Chair text” (Aug 2026); Center for International Environmental Law, “Chair’s Latest Global Plastics Treaty Draft is a Lowest-Common Denominator Text” and “What to Watch for in the New ‘No Surprises’ Plastics Treaty Draft” (Aug 2026); Environmental Investigation Agency via Oceanographic Magazine; Climate Home News, “‘We’ve gone backwards’ – new plastics treaty text dims hopes for production curbs” (Aug 2026); Geneva Environment Network / UNEP INC meeting notifications.

read more
FayrouzOne Year Since the Plastics Treaty Talks Collapsed. Has Anything Changed?

July 2026 : Environment news round-up

by Fayrouz on 29/07/2026 No comments

Our round-up of the month’s most important stories.

Destroying unsold clothes and shoes is now illegal in the EU

New regulation forces fashion brands to face and account for their overproduction problem, with resale, donation, repair, recycling or simply more thoughtful output.

 

Emerging link between microplastics and heart disease

A new study by a leading journal has found people with plastic particles in their arteries are more likely to suffer a heart attack or die in the following years than those without – and the most likely carrier of the particles? Cigarette smoke.

 

This World Cup is the most polluting in the tournament’s history

The highly criticised event managed to generate almost 3 times the amount of trash of the previous tournament in Qatar and double the average amount of CO2 emissions.

 

Reusable packaging is on the rise 

A survey of the global reuse landscape finds positive signs, with a new reuse symbol and standards; increasingly supportive legislation and incentives; and business-led innovation and cooperation all creating momentum for change.

 

The Ocean Cleanup hasn’t worked. So what happened?

Seven years after its glitzy launch, the viral project has made millions, but fallen short of its promised impact. Experts had been warning of this all along: their story is now being told.

 

As Europe turns away from incineration, its companies are selling it to the Global South

The EU has cut funding for waste-to-energy and Germany now taxes it, so European and Japanese firms are expanding elsewhere, backed by international finance and the carbon credits market.

 

Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.

To sign up to receive the newsletter, click here.

read more
FayrouzJuly 2026 : Environment news round-up

June 2026 : Environment news round-up

by Seema on 30/06/2026 No comments

Our round-up of the month’s most important stories.

Victory! Fiji rejects Australian billionaire’s ‘Pacific ashtray’ plan

The small island nation vetoed a proposal to ship in 900,000 tonnes of trash annually from across the region and burn it in a vast incinerator near the tourism gateway of Nadi. The plan was branded “waste colonialism” by local villagers. It is a strong reminder that waste-to-energy is not the clean fix it is often sold as, and that the communities asked to host it are increasingly fighting back.

 

Nike’s recycled World Cup kits are not quite the breakthrough they seem

The kits were made through the “advanced chemical recycling” of textiles, a technology heralded as the future of “circular fashion”, but experts say it’s far messier than it sounds. Chemical recycling is expensive, difficult to scale and only works with clean industrial scraps, not the mixed material, dyed, zip-and-label reality of used clothes.  Even the most optimistic industry targets are a drop in the ocean next to the 169 million tonnes of polyester being churned out each year, making it more of “an excuse to keep producing plastic clothes” than a silver bullet to textile waste.

 

Swedish football fans are peeing for the planet

Supporters at Malmö FF’s stadium are taking part in an unusual experiment: their urine is being collected, treated, and turned into fertiliser, as an alternative to synthetic petrochemical feeds. The aim is to cut dependence on fossil-fuel-based fertilisers, which globally generate around 1.13 billion tonnes of CO2E a year, more than the entire aviation sector. Researchers estimate urine could theoretically replace up to 30% of the synthetic fertilisers used in Sweden, turning something we flush away into a genuinely circular resource.

 

Volunteer facing prison after cleaning up a polluted river

UK environmental lawyer Paul Powlesland has been charged for removing trash without permission, by the very government agency whose duty it is to keep the river clean. He and a group of volunteers cleared a heavily polluted stretch of the River Roding in East London, filling over 200 bags with rubbish including packaging, needles, household appliances and even weapons. Shortly after, the Environment Agency opened an investigation into him for operating without a licence, an offence carrying a maximum penalty of two years in prison.

 

 

This Franken-can just won “Australia’s worst packaging” award

The “completely unnecessary” single-use plastic-and-metal cup, used by trendy cafés for iced drinks, is not accepted in return schemes and can’t be easily recycled – what a waste. The best packaging award, by contrast, went to a refillable milk keg system that has replaced an estimated 4.5 million single-use plastic milk bottles since 2021, proof that reuse already works when businesses choose it.

 

Air con wars: the heat is on in France

Is air con the solution to human-caused heat waves or part of the problem? The dilemma is real in French politics, as the need to protect the vulnerable is being pitched against tackling the root causes of climate breakdown. Only 25% of French households have air-conditioning, compared to 50% in Spain and Italy and 90% in the US and Japan, partly because environmentalists argue that la clim treats the symptoms of climate change while worsening its causes. But with schools closing and hospital staff describing intolerable conditions, even France’s Greens now concede it may be unavoidable.

 

Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.

To sign up to receive the newsletter, click here.

read more
SeemaJune 2026 : Environment news round-up

May 2026 : Environment news round-up

by Seema on 28/05/2026 No comments

Our round-up of the month’s most important stories.

Brand name baby food contaminated with microplastics

A new Greenpeace report has found up to 99 plastic particles per gram in Nestle and Danone baby food pouches, along with a range of plastic chemicals, prompting calls for stronger regulations to protect infants from harm, as well as for brands to go “beyond compliance” when it comes to food safety.

 

Plastic litter threatens rare mass nesting sites for turtles

Plastic packaging and fishing gear is hampering hundreds of thousands of Olive Ridley turtles as they lay eggs along the Odisha coast in India – one of the handful of such sites in the world – and endangering the hatchlings as they return to the sea.

The news comes as food and drink packaging is found to be the “world’s most common coastal litter” – found on all seven continents – and shows why beach cleanups are still so important.

 

How the Iran war is driving up the cost of your groceries

An excellent visual explainer from Reuters shows how it’s not just transport costs that are affected by the rising price of oil, but the cost of chemicals and plastics used in everyday products too.

Prices have risen particularly quickly in Asia, exposing our over-dependence on this fossil fuel material. Many, including the UN, have questioned the trade barriers blocking the use of alternative materials, and pointed to the resilience that local reuse infrastructure could provide in these times.

 

Germany and UK are largest exporters of plastic waste in 2025

The dubious honour of world’s biggest dumpers leaves recipient nations like Turkey and Malaysia unable to cope with the sheer volume of incoming trash, while legal loopholes allow these exports to count towards official recycling rates.

The EU has promised an end to non-OECD exports by November of this year. However this will not cover Turkey, nor another loophole that will allow waste to be exported to the UK (not covered by the regulations), before being shipped on to countries in the Global South.

Reusable medical equipment a safe option, study finds

Groundbreaking research on 587 patients using urinary catheters in the UK has found reusable versions to be just as safe as single-use. If the findings are adopted, it would lead to huge reductions in both cost and waste in public hospitals, as well as pave the way for further studies into other potential reusable items in healthcare.

Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.

To sign up to receive the newsletter, click here.

read more
SeemaMay 2026 : Environment news round-up

April 2026 : Environment news round-up

by Fayrouz on 30/04/2026 No comments

Our round-up of the month’s most important stories.

56 countries meet in Colombia to plan the end of fossil fuels

For the first time, 56 governments gathered in Santa Marta, Colombia to begin planning a fossil fuel phaseout – outside the usual UN process. Notably, calls to reduce petrochemicals were also on the table, with GAIA and others pushing for declining caps on plastic production as part of the transition. A second conference is already planned – in Tuvalu.

 

Gaza’s waste crisis: illegal dump sites and no end in sight

With Gaza’s waste infrastructure destroyed, 2,000 tonnes of rotting garbage is piling up daily next to camps of displaced families. The health consequences are only just beginning.

 

 

AI data centres are creating heat islands affecting 340 million people

A global survey of 6,000 data centres found they are warming the land around them by up to 9C – and the problem is largely underreported, even as they boom in number.

 

Breast implants to baby toys: the surprising sources of microplastics

A new report maps microplastic exposure across five areas of daily life – from children’s toys and household paint to hospital equipment and breast implants. Premature babies in neonatal units are estimated to receive up to 115 microplastic particles in just 72 hours. If you want to reduce your own exposure at home, the BBC has a practical guide on where to start.

 

Plastic is entering wheat and tomato plants – and stunting their growth

Microplastics in the soil are being absorbed by roots, and spread through the plant; polyester clothing fibres from laundry were found to be most harmful – and also the most prevalent in the sewage sludge used as fertiliser.

 

Sea levels are higher than we thought – and the land is sinking faster too

Two major new studies have found that 80 million people are already living on coastal land below sea level – and in many river deltas, the land is sinking faster than the sea is rising.

 

 

Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.

To sign up click here.

read more
FayrouzApril 2026 : Environment news round-up

March 2026 : Environment news round-up

by Seema on 26/03/2026 No comments

Our round-up of the month’s most important stories.

Toxic pollution from war in west Asia will spread and last for decades

Acid rain, air pollution, oil spills and multiple countries falling back on dirty fuels are just some of the catastrophic health and environmental costs of the conflict – costs that will be borne long after the financial markets restabilise and the news cycle moves on.

 

Nestle goes on trial for illegal dumping of plastic bottles in French forests

Criminal prosecutors in the Vosges region allege the world’s largest bottled water company illegally polluted soils and water with discarded plastic from their plants for decades, exposing ecosystems and millions of residents to unprecedented and “immeasurable” microplastic contamination.

 

Could giving up plastic boost your chances of having a baby?

A new Netflix documentary, The Plastic Detox, follows six couples with unexplained infertility over six months as they lower their exposure to plastics: will it finally help them conceive?

Spoiler alert: Netflix has also published an article to share what happened after the cameras stopped rolling.

 

Deadly landslide at Jakarta’s main landfill buries seven people alive under trash

The second fatal waste disaster this year in Southeast Asia, at Bantar Gebang – Indonesia’s biggest landfill – triggers calls for system reform and better protections for waste pickers.

‘Climate gaslighting’ is the new greenwashing

A new report from Clean Creatives analysing over 1800 ads documents Big Oil’s shift from making green promises to framing fossil fuels as essential to society and quietly abandoning plans to a clean energy transition.

Adults consume 250g of microplastics every year: a public health time bomb

A new study published in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry claims adults ingest a dinner plate’s worth of microplastics annually and identifies five key biological pathways for the plastic particles to harm the brain and increase the risk of neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.

Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.

To sign up click here.

read more
SeemaMarch 2026 : Environment news round-up

February 2026 : Environment news round-up

by Seema on 25/02/2026 No comments

Our round-up of the month’s most important stories.

Major win as Canada allows plastic to be legally listed as toxic

In 2021, the Canadian government included a statement in the Environmental Protection Act to recognise all manufactured plastic items as toxic. In 2023, after vociferous protests from the plastics industry, the wording was ordered to be removed by a Federal Court judge.

But now, a unanimous ruling from the Federal Court of Appeal has overturned that decision, paving the way for single-use plastics bans in Ottawa and beyond.

 

Science-backed way to clear microplastics from your body

Early research on rats in Japan suggests a common foodstuff – dietary fibre – could help to prevent ingested microplastics from entering the bloodstream, as well as helping to remove them entirely from the gut.

Scientists are now working to identify the exact type of fibre that has these effects. Until more is known, the best policy remains avoidance.

 

Breakthrough in UN plastics treaty talks as new Chair is voted in

On 7 February in Geneva, countries elected Julio Cordano, Chile’s climate COP chief negotiator, to revive the talks that have been stalled since August 2025. Although discussions at that meeting were limited to procedural matters, the outcome shows that progress is possible if parties move beyond consensus and use all available decision-making tools.

 

Endocrine disrupting chemicals found in all headphones tested

The Tox Free Life For All project found all 81 models (both in-ear and over-ear), including those from major brands like Bose, Samsung and Panasonic, contained toxic additives; and the migration from plastic to skin was found to increase with heat, sweat and daily use.

The cocktail of chemicals in plastic have been linked to the global rise in rates of cancer, obesity and infertility.

What if 1 in 10 people changed how they eat, drive, heat and shop?

A new AP report focusing on American consumers, says the result would be more than 90 million metric tons less greenhouse emissions in the USA, a remarkable reduction for small lifestyle changes in just 10% of the population.

Now, let’s hear about the impact of 1 in 10 polluting companies changing their ways! That would likely have an even greater impact.

It’s time to target the political power of polluters

A thought provoking essay suggests that to effectively address climate breakdown and environmental pollution we should spend less time worrying about emissions mitigation and more on fixing the power asymmetry between green and fossil asset owners. Read the full analysis here.

Every month we round up the top stories from the world of plastic pollution – and the work being done to stop it. From aquatic pollution to zero waste, you’ll always be up to date with the latest research, trends and greenwashing tactics.

To sign up click here.

read more
SeemaFebruary 2026 : Environment news round-up